Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Chaput's avatar

As a retired Librarian (30+ years in public and academic libraries) I'm well aware of the decreasing use of public libraries as sources of books and other material. However, I have to believe that there is more waste and abuse in other city agencies that easily could be recoved so that at least some Libraries could remain open. Also, bringing in the salaries of Library workers is a strawman. Let's look at the salaries and perks given to elected officials at all levels, especially those in city hall.

Expand full comment
JB's avatar

Clearly the function of libraries has changed with technology. I frequent the library on a regular basis and see other people there checking out and returning books. The ability to check out eBooks is a great option, especially for those that are less mobile.

The librarians (also known as research assistants) are able to teach school children how to get information from multiple sources. Using just the internet can lead to misinformation, the librarian can instruct how to find reputable sources.

Do the schools near the libraries being selected for closure have similar resources? It would be a shame to leave some children with no library resource.

The libraries also host many local activities including hosting the important function of voting.

I have no trouble allowing well behaved people using the library as a place to warm in the winter or cool in the summer. Obviously we need to do more to support people so the have alternatives to the library.

The proposal seems be very superficial focusing on the cost savings and make some general statement to support the closure. Before condemning the libraries, I would like to see a comprehensive list of what each library does, the number of people being serviced and most importantly a statement from each librarian on the benefits of having there library and impact on the community if it were to close.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts