Reno Ward 2: Three Campaigns, Three Strategies, and Five Weeks to Go
With just five weeks until the June 9 primary, the Reno Ward 2 race isn’t just a contest of candidates; it’s a clash of three different campaign models and candidate positioning.
With Naomi Duerr termed out, the field is open for Reno Ward 2. The top 3 candidates are Summer Pellett, Vanessa Vaupel, and Matt Johnson.
I’m finally seeing action from the candidates. After the redistricting, this is now my Ward, so I’m especially interested to see how it turns out.
Of the 3 candidates, I’ve only had the opportunity to talk with Matt Johnson.
The financial information in this article is based on the last filing and is likely to have changed. I will be writing an update after the next reports are filed on July 15th.
In the meantime, I’m interested in hearing what you are seeing from these candidates.
Three Campaigns, Three Timelines
The candidates are not just different; they are operating on different clocks.
Summer Pellett appears to be waiting
Vanessa Vaupel is preparing her campaign
Matt Johnson is engaging with voters
What the Campaign Filings Show
The filings tell a story most voters won’t see:
One campaign is sitting on a war chest
One is building a professional operation
One is already in the neighborhoods
And only two advance to the general election in November.
The Top Two Dynamic
Because only two candidates advance, this isn’t about winning outright.
It’s about not finishing third. That changes everything.
You don’t need a majority
You need a durable share of likely voters
Early impressions can lock in enough support to survive
Link: Johnson, Luetkehans, Pellett, and Vaupel running in Reno Ward 2 primary
You can read about the candidates in this article from the RGJ. Since Luetkehans has not raised any money, nor put up a website, I don’t cover him.
Link: Reno-area political offices and candidates
This is Reno did a questionnaire with the candidates and posted their answers.
Our Town Reno wrote about the candidates, called out Pellett’s support for Grant Denton and Karma Box after she posed with him at an event, and posted it here on her Facebook profile.
Pellett is also controversial for having voted for the Stericycle medical incineration facility in Story County in 2020. You can read about that here: Stericycle.
You can click on the image to view the Reno Ward map and see which one you are in.
Summer Pellett: The War Chest
Links: Pellett Campaign Website, Pellett Campaign Facebook
Summer Pellett is COO of Pellett Construction LLC. She isn’t just leading in fundraising; she’s operating on a different scale.
Raised: $89,969
Spent: $16,480
Cash on hand: $83,488
Her donor list reads like a who’s who of construction, development, and trade groups:
Construction Development Services — $5,000
AGC PAC — $5,000
Sierra Nevada Construction — $5,000
Mt. Rose Heating & Air — $5,000
Clark/Sullivan Construction — $5,000
Laborers Local 169 PAC — $2,500
This isn’t grassroots fundraising. It’s coordinated industry backing.
With $83,000 in reserve, Pellett can:
Flood the ward with mail in multiple waves
Run digital ads at scale
Hire consultants and field staff
But here are the numbers:
She’s spent $13,250 for mailers
Pellett has not yet built a visible voter contact infrastructure.
I have seen yard signs, but no emails or texts.
That reveals a possible strategy: Raise early. Overwhelm the field. It’s a high-risk, high-reward model, but money unused is influence unrealized.
Link: Pellett C&E Report 2026 #1
Vanessa Vaupel: The Professional Build
Links: Vauple Campaign Website, Vauple Campaign Facebook
Vaupel is a former Chief of Pharmacy for the Veterans Affairs, and sits in the middle, financially.
Raised: $29,552
Spent: $11,685
Cash on hand: $17,728
Vauple does not have:
PAC money
Major donors
Union money
Developer blocs
Her campaign is being:
Professionally structured
Strategically positioned
Built for a coordinated rollout
But here’s the odd part:
She is new to Reno and not known to voters
She has a fundraiser coming up at Duerr’s house
She’s spending her money on consultants
The spending reveals her approach: She is investing in consultants and campaign infrastructure first. With five weeks left, the timeline compresses for her to get going.
Link: Vaupel C&E Report 2026 #1
Matt Johnson: The Ground Game
Links: Johnson Campaign Website, Johnson Campaign Facebook
Matt Johnson has prior government experience with Americorps and the Conservation Corps, and is running the opposite kind of campaign.
Raised: $19,558
Spent: $5,104
Cash on hand: $13,077
He has:
The least money
The lowest burn rate
The least reliance on consultants
Johnson is:
Holding fundraisers
Knocking on doors
Distributing pieces through door drops
Sending out text messages
Writing positioning articles
Matt has something the others don’t: Actual voter contact. The point is to get it done, and Matt is doing the right things.
Link: Johnson C&E Report 2026 #1
Of the 3 I’ve only found that Matt Johnson wrote an article.
Link: Opinion: A failure to plan
The Strategic Collision Ahead
One candidate has the resources to dominate. One has the structure to compete. One is already in the field. Only two move on. Here’s how this likely plays out:
If Pellett deploys soon, she can become the dominant financial force and is likely to secure one of the two slots, but she can’t wait.
If Vaupel accelerates her professional campaign, she could consolidate broad support and compete for the second slot, but we haven’t seen anything beyond yard signs.
If Johnson sustains contact, he can build familiarity and loyalty among high-propensity voters, which is often enough to outperform better-funded candidates.
Who has the most Appeal?
The candidates appeal to different voter segments.
Pellett’s donor‑driven model resonates with pro‑growth and development interests, but if she waits, she risks being the best‑funded candidate voters never meet.
Vaupel’s messaging appeals to healthcare‑adjacent voters, but if Vaupel doesn’t accelerate, her professional build may not matter until it is too late.
Johnson’s door‑knocking hits hardest in high‑propensity precincts, especially the older neighborhoods. If Johnson can scale his outreach, he can go for the win.
This isn’t just a three-way race. It’s a strategic contest. With five weeks left, the race comes down to timing: Who reaches the voters multiple times before June 9?
What are you seeing in your neighborhood? Leave a comment and let us know.
Support Reno independent journalism. Click to donate to: Mike’s Reno Report.
We have seen plenty of mailers from Pellet, no human contact. FYI...Ross for Reno walkers are the only human contact to date. His message of " spend within your means, balance the budget",
is resonating with my neighbors. It seems Reno may be awakening and their is a people's revolt against career politicians and their terrible management of City resources.
Pellet may be new but she's a Developer...not good for Reno City Council. We already have Reese selling out at every opportunity, don't need anymore sell outs.
Thanks for the link to the excellent article about Stericycle. I knew some but not all of their history. Pellett served for six years on the Storey Planning Commission and actually made the motion to approve this facility. It is disheartening to learn that less than an hour was spent on something that has such potential for damage and was also so controversial for locals. I can only hope their business here is not as damaging as it has been in other places.